The company has always emphasized that middleware can be universal. NVIDIA and Horizon have both mass-produced it. Don’t other companies have middleware? Why must we use ours? And generally speaking, once a platform is established, middleware can be reused? In the face of competition, what is the company’s leading advantage in middleware? What is the future of its application?

Thundersoft: Hello. The company is engaged in the pan-operating system platform. That is, from the application layer algorithm API down to the software field above BSP, plus the kernel-level operating system, it also includes core middleware, etc. This is the scope of the entire large pan-operating system. The company provides an open operating system platform. On the one hand, the company will reduce the difficulty of application algorithms and OEMs for application algorithm transplantation, so it will do a good job of building a good framework. In the end, the OEM can choose to use its own framework, or rely on the company's platform. The company can provide a framework, and the OEM can design and debug on the platform later. It mainly depends on the choice of the OEM. On the other hand, if the vehicle manufacturer has its own ADAS application layer capabilities, the company provides more system software capabilities. If the vehicle manufacturer has limited capabilities in this field, the company can provide customers with an overall solution including the system software layer and the application software layer. Thank you for your attention!